Nevada Seniors Coalition
Becoming a Member
Calendar of Events
Senior Citizen Links
State of Nevada
"We hold these truths to be self
evident . . . . "
"Do not tax the necessities of life." Wealth of Nations
So, what happened in the 2015 legislative session which was so dominated by taxation? Nothing good and a lot bad. Not one single legislator spoke against the billion dollar plus business revenue tax plan basing their opposition on the Principle: "Do not tax the necessities of life. "Even the handful of "No taxes" conservatives could not articulate the cruelty, viciousness and horrible economic injustice of Gov. Sandoval's proposed (now law) plan.
As brilliant, moral, decent and pragmatic as the Principle is it made no difference at all when you've
got a legislature and governor who are either ignorant of it, afraid of it or know it but just don't care.
They wanted the money and they got the money. What could be more important? Besides, it's for the "greater
good" isn't it? It's for the children’s education, right?
There is a new game being played by the national media. It falls into the category of "Gotcha" journalism. It was first played successfully on Jeb Bush then moved on to the other Republican candidates for President. It goes like this: "Knowing what you know now would you have invaded Iraq?"
For Jeb Bush and the Republican candidates it's a lose-lose question which a cynic might say is its raison
d'etre. As silly as the game is it occurred to me it might be fun to expand and play with it. Ready?
There was an interesting article in the RJ on June 3rd. The headline read, "Public more wary of billionaires' electoral sway." Straight out of 'Casablanca' the author rounded up the usual suspects naming billionaires on both sides who are spending huge amounts of money to "buy" elections. Fries, Mercer Adelson and, of course, the Koch brothers on the Republican side. Alice Walton, Mark Benioff, Steyer and Soroson the Democratic side. Clash of the Titans? Well, maybe, but what are the results of all this spending, besides the benefits of all that cash going out of their pockets and into society in general? An outfit called the Sunlight Foundation tracked the big money in the 2012 & 2014 elections. Turns out that on either side the results were not that great. For example, Steyer spent $79 million in 2014 with $17.9 million directed to specific congressional races. His failure rate was 68%. That's nothing compared to Adelson who spent $100 million in 2012 with a failure rate of 100%.
Bottom line? We will vote the way we want to vote and all the noise coming from the 1%, on either side, isn't going to make a heck of a lot of difference to us. It might be helpful to keep that in mind when the speech control freaks come around whining about 'Citizen's United'.